In the
uncharted lands of the deep south, there lies a small city with a strange
dichotomy of mainly two groups of people with opposite schools of thought. These include modern puritanicals of dualistic
thinking whose behaviors strive to become society’s slaves to a conveyor belt
of cookie cut out materialists and intellectual slacktavists. On the other hand, you have an unfolding community of
folks who appear to be naturalistic bohemians who seek to detach from the norms
of society, strive for individuality, new thought, and environmental
conservatism. In typical perspectives of American “culture”, anyone who doesn’t
spend their lives investing time and energy into a capitalistic society that
poisons its own people with absurd limitations, strives to oppress intellect
and individuality, and who literally destroys their own natural habitat by
desecrating natural resources for material wealth and personal power, is
considered a tree hugging, hippy, hipster, beatnik, fag loving, rainbow child.
Trying to
understand the zeitgeist in which these perspectives have developed will take
some psychological, sociological, and historical explanations and basic brush
ups of the origin of this insanity.
Firstly, contributions
to the psychological zeitgeist in which the general opposing schools of thought
target the limited and the unlimited classifications of mental dispositions
from a mainstream approach are coined by team Jung and team Freud. Many people
who are educated in psychology understand these two people as the pioneers of
modern developmental psychology, and consider them both credible enough to be
able to say they are usually for or against one of these individual’s overall philosophies. Carl Jung’s major goal was to be able to
teach people that were considered mentally ill to be able to work through their
attachments by beginning to detach from their previous identity created by
society. Most people are taught to associate their identities to their actions,
mannerisms, experiences, and even unfortunate genetic predispositions to
certain chemical imbalances that may result in an individual’s mentality to be
distraught, or just different from what is considered the norm. Freud, on the
other hand was addicted to two things: cocaine and sex. He was so obsessed with
human sexuality that he used his higher education to create theories of why all
human behavior was rooted in sexual impulses. He opposed Jung’s ideas of
identity recreation, and preferred to classify [what are considered] mental
disorders so that he could require his patients to become dependent on outside
sources to maintain mental balance; external sources being medication and
institutionalization, neither of which actually taught the individual to allow
a discourse of acceptance that would nourish the dis-ease of the patient enough
to cause the illness to eventually dissipate. The point in his view was to
calmly detain and suppress people and their disorders which may have actually
increased the fear of having such disorders, and being associated with people
who had them. Fragmentation, classification, and separation as a means to treat
mental disorders simply go against any possible manner in which to heal the
patient completely.
These two
schools of thought provoke many philosophical theories to the creation of
specific belief systems. Some of these include ideas about if humans are even capable
of detachment from suffering, or if our we already contain what is needed to
not suffer. Or, are we doomed by identifying ourselves with external
situations, content, and form, so much so that we are slaves to technical
behaviors done because we wish to achieve a certain outcome? It is said that
the latter is one definition of insanity; to do the same thing over and over,
expecting a different outcome.
The typical
American is not taught to think outside of the box, because over time, it has
become the representation of total control of the masses by persuading people
to become dependent on outside sources, by not looking within, and to do the
same behaviors over and over, expecting a different result. This period of time
will serve as a huge lesson for the future, when mankind has become bored of
destruction, and has risen in awareness needed to transcend consistent cycles
of destruction to decide to try something different.
Now, in
sociological terms, relativism is the understanding that everyone, everywhere,
has a completely different set of rules in their reality due to learned
behaviors that originate from their culture, and, that there is no righter
culture, belief system, or rules of reality that generate miscellaneous
hierarchical seniority. Again, this is not what Americans are taught. Americans
are programmed by financially backed power houses to utilize material
distractions to derail from individuality and cultural relativism. The “American
Dream” is a limiting set of mundane activities whose purpose is to achieve
optimal material wealth. It generally yields dept, destruction and
overconsumption of natural resources, and marketing schemes that propagate this
repetitive cycle. Most people do not realize they are choosing to be a part of
this cycle, and that they have total free will to change this cycle. I could
confidently say that a good 10% of the entire population of Americans is trying
to encourage others to stop propagating this cycle by first, questioning their values, next, understanding where their belief systems come from, and finally transcending limiting belief
systems to ultimately become individualistic and pursue personal endeavors that
they find of value with a new perspective on human life.
Now, it is
time to elaborate on the historical taproot of what has created the power train
of America, who the “1%” actually is, and why they seek to control the masses
with politics and religion.
Growing up in America we are taught
that the powerful are here to protect us and help others in need with charity,
or with taxes for the poor. Information provided in schools has extremely
limited learning methods, with one right answer chosen out of a group of wrong
answers. History is taught only from a perspective which appears to victimize
the power hungry people that enslaved millions of Africans, and subjected
Native Americans to genocide. I realize that there are good hearted people that
have evolved into life here in this country that only want to appreciate the history
for what it is worth, and show gratitude for the “freedom” that we have as a
country. This is understandable. Optimism is one of the greatest virtues that
creates strong character, but I only wish to point out that only pieces of the
story are told, and in such a way that condescends to others that wish to think
outside the box. Critical thinking is basically non-existent in public education.
Why ? Well since America is so fond of its history, and its origin of
excellence from the founding fathers like George Washington and Abraham
Lincoln, we will cover something that is undoubtedly unclassified information
that outlines the true origin of America- yet is not taught in schools.
Free
masonry is an extremely secretive elitist group of individuals that sought to
preserve ideological information of centuries past, and included plans for
creating a “utopian” society; and the first stakeout was America. Most great men who go on to become our
senators and presidents already have their foot in the door because they come
from wealthy families, or, they are members of secret elitist groups that
decide how they will control the masses in the present and future. It is common
knowledge that America and all associations to it are owned and controlled by
50 of the wealthiest families on earth. This is what is referred to as the 1%.
It isn’t a conspiracy, it is unclassified common knowledge. So, what do these
families discuss? These people have
access to more information than anyone in the world, and make decisions on how
they will carve out this country, and our planet. Well, the original ideas
discussed in the elitist groups of free masons included sociology, mass
psychology, and total evaluation of the zeitgeist through understanding the
foundation of belief systems. In other words, the information discussed
originally was to promote free thinking, expansion, and how to manifest
anything mankind could want. However, the flipside to this coin is that this
crucial information was kept private. Centuries ago, “Blue Bloods” were
families who incestuously continued their royal air by keeping the blood line
pure. The more we study quantum physics, the more we learn that everything is
connected by energy in our holographic universe. Well, everything in existence
is a different frequency of energy. The origin of the elitist thought comes
from the desire of the ego to survive and thrive, and allowing the weak to die
off; hence, nature vs. nurture. The
creation of the elite was not necessarily the origin of evil, but an experiment
from the destructive nature of ego.
Essentially,
where we are in the world right now revolves around destruction of our species.
Oil basically sums up every power struggle, war, and reason that our people and
planet are being destroyed. Expert theorists
claim that 9/11, the war on “terror”, and basically all of the strategies in
war propaganda in the middle east for the past six decades have been to obtain
and control the world’s supply of dinosaur juice. It is now declassified
information that the Vietnam War was started under false flag pretenses. In
other words, our government made shit up to kill innocent people, including its
own people, for its own power motives. Now, people in our country are too
scared to even mention 9/11’s inconsistencies because every person who has
stepped up in court about how Building Number 7 went down before the plane hit
the first tower has been murdered with the ending verdict of each individual
ruled as a “suicide”. Even GMO’s,
genetically modified organisms, or synthetic, unnatural foodstuffs unlabeled
and placed in our food in some cases without our knowledge, is actually backed
by petroleum companies.
I once had a
discussion with someone about the definition of anarchy. I asked him, “What is
anarchy?” He replied with, “Well, anarchy is an uncontrolled society where
people do whatever they want. This could lead to groups of people killing
whoever they want, taking whatever they want from whoever they want, and total
corruption.” I thought for a moment and said, “So our government is composed of
well financed anarchists?”
No comments:
Post a Comment